{"id":782,"date":"2024-09-25T18:00:32","date_gmt":"2024-09-25T15:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/?p=782"},"modified":"2024-09-26T13:01:00","modified_gmt":"2024-09-26T10:01:00","slug":"iscinin-9-yillik-sure-icinde-izin-kullanmamasi-hayatin-olagan-akisina-aykiri-oldugu-gibi-iscinin-ust-duzey-yonetici-olmasi-ve-kac-gun-yillik-izin-kullandigina-dair-net-bir-beyani-olmamasi-dikkate-alin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/25\/iscinin-9-yillik-sure-icinde-izin-kullanmamasi-hayatin-olagan-akisina-aykiri-oldugu-gibi-iscinin-ust-duzey-yonetici-olmasi-ve-kac-gun-yillik-izin-kullandigina-dair-net-bir-beyani-olmamasi-dikkate-alin\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin 9 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde izin kullanmamas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00fcst d\u00fczey y\u00f6netici olmas\u0131 ve ka\u00e7 g\u00fcn y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair net bir beyan\u0131 olmamas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin miktar\u0131ndan %50 oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2024\/6366 E. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2024\/9427 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

04.06.2024 T.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SAYISI : 2023\/1419 E., 2023\/2306 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 15. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SAYISI : 2018\/533 E., 2023\/153 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin 18.10.2018 tarihli karar\u0131 ile g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve dosyan\u0131n Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin kald\u0131rma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildi. Daval\u0131 vekilince temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n istenilmesi \u00fczerine, i\u015fin duru\u015fmaya t\u00e2bi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve duru\u015fma i\u00e7in 04.06.2024 Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc tayin edilerek taraflara tebligat g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 vekili Avukat … ile davac\u0131 vekili Avukat … geldiler. Duru\u015fmaya ba\u015flanarak haz\u0131r bulunan avukatlar\u0131n s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendikten sonra duru\u015fmaya sonverildi. Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fid\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I. DAVA <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde 07.09.2007-10.04.2017 tarihine kadar daval\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde en son genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr \u00fcnvan\u0131 ile, i\u015fletmenin ve i\u015fyerinin b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fc sevk ve idare etmekle yetkili ve sadece Y\u00f6netim Kuruluna ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015fveren vekili olarak ayl\u0131k net 25.000,00 TL \u00fccretle \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00f6ncelikle i\u015fe giri\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda t\u00fcm personelle imzalanan klasik ve herhangi bir \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7ermeyen i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fakat m\u00fcvekkilinin pozisyonu gere\u011fi i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 22.12.2016tarihli ek protokol ile revize edildi\u011fini, ek protokol ile taraflar aras\u0131nda imzalanan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin (7.2) ve(7.3) h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na ve i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine “Fesih Maddesi” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 8 inci maddenin eklenmesine karar verildi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z olarak feshedildi\u011fini, 42.143,56 TL k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, 33.475,54 TL ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve 10 g\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak 5.133,31 TL \u00fccret alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fini, bu \u00f6demenin eksik oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek \u00fccretinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm s\u00fcre boyunca eksik bildirildi\u011fini, i\u015ften ayr\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce net 25.000,00 TL \u00fccret al\u0131yor olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen 15.000,00 TL \u00fczerinden sigortal\u0131 g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, elden \u00fccret uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde genel bir uygulama oldu\u011funu belirterek ihbar tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin alaca\u011f\u0131, prim alaca\u011f\u0131 ile \u00fccret ve iade al\u0131nan bilgisayar bedeli alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

II. CEVAP<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; \u00f6ncelikle g\u00f6rev itiraz\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015eirkette genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr s\u0131fat\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta iken i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan taraflar aras\u0131ndaki hukuki ili\u015fkinin bir i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi niteli\u011finde de\u011fil vek\u00e2let s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ili\u015fkisi niteli\u011finde say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan bir s\u00fcre sonra26.05.2017 tarihinde i\u015fyerine geldi\u011fini, kendisine yasal alacaklar\u0131 olan k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve 10g\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00fccretinin \u00f6denece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi ve bu ama\u00e7la bir \u00e7ek tanzim edilerek \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunun davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemesi \u00fczerine de \u00f6demenin davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n fesih tarihi itibar\u0131yla net \u00fccretinin 15.000,00 TL oldu\u011funu, \u00fccretinin t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6demesinin banka kanal\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131n\u0131n 07.09.2007-10.04.2017tarihleri aras\u0131nda en son net 15.000,00 TL ayl\u0131k \u00fccretle daval\u0131ya ait i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 olmayan nedenle feshedildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n ihbar tazminat\u0131na hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131, prim ve y\u0131ll\u0131k izin alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011finin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ispatlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccret ve iade al\u0131nan bilgisayar bedeli alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu alacaklara hak kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekilince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri Daval\u0131 vekili; davada g\u00f6revli mahkemesinin ticaret mahkemesi oldu\u011funu, protokol\u00fcn ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 def’inde bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr oldu\u011funu ve bu g\u00f6revden kaynakl\u0131 konumu ve yetkileri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlere ili\u015fkin olarak kendisine bir belgenin imzalat\u0131lamayacak oldu\u011funu belirterek \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemi ile istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131 ile daval\u0131 \u015eirket aras\u0131nda hukuki anlamda vek\u00e2let ili\u015fkisinden s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki i\u015f\u00e7i i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinden kaynakl\u0131 i\u015f ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011fu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ek protokol\u00fcn (8.2) nci maddesi ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi h\u00e2linde ihbar s\u00fcresinin 1 y\u0131l olarak belirlenece\u011fi ve 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccreti tutar\u0131 \u00f6denece\u011finin ve (8.3) \u00fcnc\u00fc madde de i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshi h\u00e2linde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan her y\u0131la kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k 1 ayl\u0131k net \u00fccreti tutar\u0131nda prim \u00f6denece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 neden bildirilmeksizin feshedildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 ilgili protokol\u00fcn (8.2) ve (8.3) maddeleri gere\u011fince belirlenen kurallar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n bakiye ihbar tazminat\u0131na ve prim \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131na hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair daval\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin defteri veya e\u015fde\u011fer yaz\u0131l\u0131 belge sunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k izin alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili temyiz istemindebulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri Daval\u0131 vekili; istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde belirtti\u011fi sebepler ile temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretinin miktar\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131, y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin ve prim alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve hesaplanmas\u0131 noktas\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile371 inci maddesi. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun (4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 17, 32 ve 53, 59 uncu maddeleri. Dairemizin 07.06.2021 tarihli ve 2021\/5697 Esas, 2021\/9959 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taraflar\u0131n iddia, savunma ve dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki nitelendirilmesi ile uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131na, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lamaya h\u00e2kim olan ilkelere, ispat kurallar\u0131na ve temyiz olunan kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere g\u00f6re daval\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraflar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi taraflara s\u00fcrekli olarak bor\u00e7 y\u00fckleyen bir \u00f6zel hukuk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi olsa da taraflardan herhangi birinin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini bozmak i\u00e7in kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa y\u00f6neltti\u011fi irade a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla ili\u015fkiyi sona erdirmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Fesih … i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini derhal veya belirli bir s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mesiyle ortadan kald\u0131rabilme yetkisi veren bozucu yenilik do\u011furan ve kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa y\u00f6neltilmesi gereken bir hakt\u0131r. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17 nci maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen bildirimli fesih, belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusudur. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla belirli s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde fesheden taraf\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa bildirimde bulunarak bildirim s\u00fcresi tan\u0131mas\u0131 gerekmez. Bildirim s\u00fcrelerine ili\u015fkin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17 nci maddesindeki kurallar nispi emredici niteliktedir. Taraflarca bildirim s\u00fcreleri ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lamaz ya da azalt\u0131lamaz. Ancak, s\u00fcrelerin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile artt\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi Kanun’da d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Bildirim s\u00fcrelerinin artt\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi kanunda belirtilmi\u015f olmakla birlikte bir \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Dairemiz taraf\u0131ndan, \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2kimin belirlemesi gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmektedir (Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi,21.03.2006 tarihli ve 2006\/109 Esas, 2006\/7052 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131). Dairemizce bildirim s\u00fcresinin, en fazla ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131na esas s\u00fcre kadar artt\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi kabul edilmektedir. Somut olayda, “Hizmet Akdi Ek Protokol\u00fc” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 protokol\u00fcn (8.2) nci maddesinde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinde bildirim s\u00fcresinin 1 y\u0131l olaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Belirtmek gerekir ki 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 17 nci maddesinde bildirim s\u00fcrelerinin artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair bir \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r olmamas\u0131, bu art\u0131\u015f\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z olarak yap\u0131labilece\u011fi \u015feklinde yorumlanmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Aksine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce tarz\u0131, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile bildirim s\u00fcresinin 10 y\u0131l olarak belirlenmesine ve uygulanmas\u0131na da imk\u00e2n verebilir. Yine, i\u015fverence k\u00f6t\u00fc niyete dayanan bir fesih durumunda hesaplanmas\u0131 gereken k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131n\u0131n tutar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, fahi\u015f \u015fekilde belirlenen bildirim s\u00fcrelerine h\u00e2kimin m\u00fcdahalesinin gereklili\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bunun kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yer alan s\u00f6zle\u015fme serbestisi ilkesi ile \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme gidilmesi, zaman zaman hakkaniyete uygun olmayan sonu\u00e7lara yol a\u00e7abilmektedir. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 2 nci maddesinde, \u201cHerkes, haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullan\u0131rken ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirirken d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131na uymak zorundad\u0131r. Bir hakk\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hukuk d\u00fczeni korumaz.\u201d kural\u0131 mevcuttur. Bildirim s\u00fcresini fahi\u015f \u015fekilde art\u0131ran ek protokol h\u00fckm\u00fc, i\u015fverenin bildirimli fesih hakk\u0131n\u0131 orant\u0131s\u0131z bir \u015fekilde s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi i\u015f g\u00fcvencesi sa\u011flayan kurumlardan biri olan ihbar tazminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemenin amac\u0131n\u0131 da a\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler do\u011frultusunda, ihbar tazminat\u0131n\u0131n, bildirim s\u00fcresinin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Dairemizce benimsenen \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r dikkate al\u0131narak hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekir. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 59 uncu maddesinde, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin herhangi bir sebeple sona ermesi h\u00e2linde, i\u015f\u00e7iye kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin s\u00fcrelerine ait \u00fccretlerin son \u00fccret \u00fczerinden \u00f6denece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u0131ll\u0131k izin hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccrete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi i\u00e7in s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona erme \u015feklinin ve hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda ispat y\u00fck\u00fc i\u015fverene aittir. \u0130\u015fveren y\u0131ll\u0131k izinlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 imzal\u0131 izin defteri veya e\u015fde\u011fer bir belge ile ispatlamal\u0131d\u0131r. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 31 inci maddesinde, h\u00e2kimin davay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma \u00f6devi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup h\u00e2kim uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda, maddi veya hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan belirsiz yahut \u00e7eli\u015fkili g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar hakk\u0131nda, taraflara a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131rabilecek, soru sorabilecek ve delil g\u00f6sterilmesiniisteyebilecektir. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davac\u0131n\u0131n 9 y\u0131l boyunca hi\u00e7 izin kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131 ve h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131 as\u0131l\u0131n ilk Derece Mahkemesi duru\u015fmas\u0131nda “… \u00fczerinden \u00e7ok sene ge\u00e7ti\u011fi i\u00e7in ne kadar y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 hat\u0131rlam\u0131yorum, i\u015fler \u00e7ok yo\u011fun oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bayram tatilleri ile birle\u015ftirip kullan\u0131rd\u0131m. …” \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde genel m\u00fcd\u00fcr (\u00fcst d\u00fczey y\u00f6netici) olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olup y\u0131ll\u0131k izin belgesini d\u00fczenlettirme yetkisine sahiptir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n 9 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde izin kullanmamas\u0131 hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi beyan\u0131nda da izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015f; ancak ne kadar y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde net bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm bilgi ve belgeler, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcst d\u00fczey y\u00f6netici olmas\u0131 ve ka\u00e7 g\u00fcn y\u0131ll\u0131k izin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair net bir beyan\u0131 olmamas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan y\u0131ll\u0131k izin miktar\u0131ndan %50oran\u0131nda indirim yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekli iken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile karar verilmesi de hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

VI. KARAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Temyiz olunan, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, Daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na takdir edilen 17.100,00 TL duru\u015fma vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin davac\u0131 tarafa y\u00fckletilmesine, Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine, Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,04.06.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi 2024\/6366 E. 2024\/9427 K. 04.06.2024 T. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Hukuk Dairesi SAYISI : 2023\/1419 E., 2023\/2306 K. KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 15. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi SAYISI : 2018\/533 E., 2023\/153 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=782"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":786,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782\/revisions\/786"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}