{"id":788,"date":"2024-09-26T14:05:26","date_gmt":"2024-09-26T11:05:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/?p=788"},"modified":"2024-09-26T14:05:26","modified_gmt":"2024-09-26T11:05:26","slug":"mirasin-reddi-veya-mirastan-feragat-edilmis-olmasi-ilgili-kisinin-mirascilik-belgesi-istemesine-engel-degildir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/26\/mirasin-reddi-veya-mirastan-feragat-edilmis-olmasi-ilgili-kisinin-mirascilik-belgesi-istemesine-engel-degildir\/","title":{"rendered":"Miras\u0131n reddi veya mirastan feragat edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgili ki\u015finin miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi istemesine engel de\u011fildir."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2022\/2907 E. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

2023\/4228 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

28.09.2023 T.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk Dairesi
SAYISI : 2021\/372 E., 2022\/480 K.
KARAR : Esastan ret
\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 18. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi
SAYISI : 2018\/473 E., 2020\/308 K.

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin iptali ve yeni miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin verilmesi davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.

Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 … vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 … vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:


I. DAVA
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fcvekkilinin babas\u0131 …’\u0131n 17.03.2016 tarihinde vefat etti\u011fini, daval\u0131lardan … ile murisin Ankara 52. Noterli\u011finde 05.01.2015 tarih ve 00235 yevmiye numaral\u0131 mirastan feragat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi d\u00fczenledi\u011fini, Fatmag\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn miras pay\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131ndan ve sakl\u0131 paya ili\u015fkin miras hakk\u0131ndan feragat etti\u011fini, ancak buna ra\u011fmen K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/223 Esas, 2018\/212 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 ile muris …’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi veraset belgesi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/223 Esas, 2018\/212 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 veraset il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile yeniden veraset il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenlenmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.

II. CEVAP
Daval\u0131lardan … vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n bu davaya dayanak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 mirastan feragat belgesinin Ankara 8. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2016\/490 Esas, 2016\/594 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 il\u00e2m\u0131 ile ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kesinle\u015fti\u011fini, \u00f6ncelikle kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili …’\u0131n \u015fizofreni hastas\u0131 oldu\u011funu, 2001 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri Hacettepe \u00dcniversitesi Hastanesinde psikiyatri b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde tedavi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, feragat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin m\u00fcvekkili temyiz kudretine sahip bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n murisin yasal miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; muris …’\u0131n 17.03.2016 tarihinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, geriye miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olarak e\u015fi … ile \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 …, …, …, … ve … ile miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden daval\u0131 …’\u0131n kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/223 Esas, 2018\/212 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 veraset il\u00e2m\u0131n\u0131n iptaline, …’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmesi nedeniyle muris …’\u0131n miras\u0131n\u0131n 20 pay kabul edilerek 5 pay\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fi …’a, 3’erden 15 pay\u0131n\u0131n da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 di\u011fer daval\u0131lar …, …, …, … ve …’a aidiyetine ve davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF
A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 … vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
Daval\u0131n\u0131n 2001 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri \u015fizofreni hastas\u0131 olarak tedavi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n alg\u0131lama ve do\u011fru karar verme yetene\u011fine tesir etti\u011fini, kolay etki al\u0131na al\u0131nabilece\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131y\u0131 kand\u0131rmak suretiyle feragat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini imzalatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerek\u00e7esiz ve denetime elveri\u015fli olmayan adli t\u0131p raporunun h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, rapora kar\u015f\u0131 itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczde seksen oran\u0131nda engelli oldu\u011fu hususundaki rapor aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmedi\u011fini, rapora y\u00f6nelik itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n genel kuruldan rapor almak suretiyle giderilmesi gerekti\u011fini, raporu d\u00fczenleyen doktorlar hakk\u0131ndaki sahtelik iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik savc\u0131l\u0131k dosya sonucunun beklenmedi\u011fini, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini belirtmek suretiyle istinaf etmi\u015ftir.

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; daval\u0131 …\u2019\u0131n feragat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini bilerek ve isteyerek imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihinde fiil ehliyetini ortadan kald\u0131ran bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, eldeki davada kendisini temsil etmek \u00fczere vekil tayin edebildi\u011fi, bug\u00fcne kadar k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde dosyadaki delillerin h\u00fckme yeterli oldu\u011fu, Adli T\u0131p Genel Kurulundan rapor al\u0131nmamas\u0131nda bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; \u00f6te yandan kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm iddias\u0131na konu Ankara 8. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2016\/490 Esas, 2016\/594 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n, savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen feragatnamenin gere\u011finin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda talepte bulunulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Mahkemece feragat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin vasiyetnamenin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine t\u00e2bi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle talebin reddine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu, eldeki dava ile konusunun ayn\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle Mahkemece verilen karar usul ve yasaya uygun bulunarak daval\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.

V. TEMY\u0130Z
A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 … vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.

B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\u0130stinaf dilek\u00e7esi tekrarlanarak, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince istinaf itirazlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lanmaks\u0131z\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz karar olu\u015fturdu\u011fu belirtilerek temyiz talebinde bulunulmu\u015ftur.

C. Gerek\u00e7e
1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin mirastan feragat nedeniyle iptali ile yeni miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi verilmesi istemlerine ili\u015fkindir.

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
1. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 598 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine yasal miras\u00e7\u0131 olduklar\u0131 belirlenenlere sulh mahkemesince miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fatlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren bir belge verilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.

2. Miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi istemek, maddi bir olay\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ikrar ile ki\u015filer aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisini tespit ettirmekten ibarettir. Hakk\u0131nda mirastan \u00e7\u0131karma ve yoksunluk sebepleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen veya miras\u0131 reddeden ya da mirastan feragat eden miras\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n tereke ile ili\u015fkisi t\u00fcmden kesilmi\u015f say\u0131lmaz. Mirastan \u00e7\u0131karma ve yoksunluk sebeplerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi ya da miras\u0131n reddi veya mirastan feragat edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, ilgili ki\u015finin miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi istemesine engel bir neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, ilgili ki\u015finin miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 da ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. Bu nedenle miras\u00e7\u0131lardan biri veya birka\u00e7\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mirastan \u00e7\u0131karma ve yoksunluk sebeplerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi ya da miras\u0131n reddi veya mirastan feragat edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda bu olgular yok say\u0131larak miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 ve miras paylar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir \u015fekilde miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin d\u00fczenlenmesi, h\u00fck\u00fcm yerinde ilgili miras\u00e7\u0131 veya miras\u00e7\u0131lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mirastan \u00e7\u0131karma ve yoksunluk sebeplerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ya da miras\u0131 ret veya mirastan feragat ettikleri a\u00e7\u0131klanarak ret, feragat, miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131ktan \u00e7\u0131karma, mirastan yoksunluk hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n terekenin b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6zetilece\u011fine i\u015faret edilmek suretiyle miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 yitiren ki\u015finin pay\u0131n\u0131n kime veya kimlere kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesi verilmelidir.

3. De\u011ferlendirme
1. Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkeler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya gelince; K\u0131z\u0131lcahamam Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2018\/223 Esas, 2018\/212 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 dava dosyas\u0131nda miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilen daval\u0131 Fatmanur \u0130lhan\u2019\u0131n miras pay\u0131ndan feragat etmesi nedeniyle, iptale ili\u015fkin kararda feragat yokmu\u015f gibi t\u00fcm miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi, sonras\u0131nda feragat durumuna i\u015faret edilmesi; ancak miras pay\u0131ndan feragat nedeni ile miras pay\u0131n\u0131n kime kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da belirtilmesi gerekmektedir.
2. O h\u00e2lde, miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin iptali \u00fczerine yeniden verilecek miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinde irs ili\u015fkisinin kesilmemesi amac\u0131 ile muris …\u2019\u0131n miras\u0131ndan feragat eden …\u2019\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilmesi, HMK\u2019n\u0131n 297 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca infazda teredd\u00fct olu\u015fturmayacak \u015fekilde mirastan feragat nedeniyle miras pay\u0131n\u0131n kime kalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n paylar\u0131 da g\u00f6sterilmek suretiyle belirlenmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f; bu nedenle h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.

VI. KARAR
A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;
1. Temyiz olunan, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine ili\u015fkin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA,

2. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,

Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,

Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,

28.09.2023 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2022\/2907 E. \u00a0 2023\/4228 K. 28.09.2023 T. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 15. Hukuk DairesiSAYISI : 2021\/372 E., 2022\/480 K.KARAR : Esastan ret\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 18. Asliye Hukuk MahkemesiSAYISI : 2018\/473 E., 2020\/308 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin iptali ve yeni miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k belgesinin verilmesi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/788"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=788"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":789,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/788\/revisions\/789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/arabaciogluhukuk.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}